The Journal of Engineering, Informatics, Communication, Science & Technology, Education, (Christian)Theology, and Multidisciplinary Knowledge ( EICSTEM Journal) implements a double-blind peer review process to ensure scientific quality, fairness, and objectivity. The review procedure consists of the following stages:

1. Initial Editorial Screening

• Submitted manuscripts are checked for completeness, relevance to the journal’s focus and scope, and adherence to author guidelines.

• A plagiarism check is conducted using specialized software.

• Manuscripts failing to meet basic requirements may be rejected at this stage (desk rejection).

2. Reviewer Assignment

• Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are assigned to at least two reviewers who are experts in the field.

• The journal uses a double-blind system, ensuring anonymity for both authors and reviewers.

3. Peer Review Process

• Reviewers assess the manuscript’s scientific quality, methodology, originality, contribution to knowledge, and clarity of presentation.

• Reviewers provide recommendations:

  • Accept

  • Minor revision

  • Major revision

  • Reject

• Feedback is provided objectively and constructively.

4. Author Revision

• Authors are required to revise the manuscript according to reviewers’ comments.

• Revisions must be accompanied by a response to reviewers document detailing the changes made.

• Incomplete or inadequate revisions may result in additional revision requests.

5. Editorial Decision

• After revisions are submitted, the editor evaluates the revised manuscript and reviewer feedback.

• The editor makes the final decision to accept, request further revision, or reject the manuscript.

6. Final Editing and Publication

• Accepted manuscripts undergo final editing for layout, language, and formatting.

• The article is then scheduled for publication in the journal’s monthly issue.